John, I am going under the assumption that you meant 29 September and not 29 November in your message about the proposed meeting since Nov 11th would have passed before the 29th of Nov. I am also figuring that the time and place will remain the same. If this is correct, please let all of us know. Thanks, Frank-AA0ZP
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 20 2006 - 23:45:10 CDT